Should parents smack their children Free Essay Example.

Smacking Children Essay Sample. The smacking of a child is a highly controversial subject within our society today. What is classed as a smack? Who can smack a child? How often should this be done? A smack is generally issued by parents or carers as form of discipline; to show children who have misbehaved there will be a negative response as a consequence. This then instils the child to not.

In this essay I am going to outline and assess the effects of smacking children and what the consequences are in later life. I will use evidence and statistics and evaluate the outcome of them. Do you want your child to grow up with violence, theft, drugs and bulling? Dr Phill Jones argues that children who were smacked as a child are more likely to bully, use drugs and get involved in violent.

Boris Johnsons, Mayor of London, recently made a statement about the current smacking legalisation, enforced under Labour’s Children Act of 2004, which states that parents are only allowed to smack their offspring without causing a “reddening of the skin”. “People do feel anxious about imposing discipline on their children, whether the law will support them.” He told BBC Radio 5.

Some people are for smacking children as they feel hitting children allows discipline whereas other people feel that smacking children in an ineffective way of discipline and only teaches violence. Therefore In this essay I intend to put across both side of the arguments and then conclude with my own personnel opinion. Some people are against smacking children because the research evidence.

Smacking children: what you need to know. Smacking is a physical punishment. Smacking looks like it works because children stop what they’re doing when they get a smack. But smacking isn’t a good choice for discipline. That’s because it doesn’t help children learn about self-control or appropriate behaviour. As a form of punishment, smacking has three other big drawbacks. First, there.

Overall, thinking that idea of smacking children is the best approach to discipline is dangerous in itself and may result in raising up aggressive and depressive adults. In conclusion, this essay argued few reasons why people support smacking children method to raise a disciplined child and how such parenting style can have numerous adverse effects on child's personality.

In Scotland, a public consultation has begun into whether smacking should be banned. BBC News reports: Proposals to ban parents in Scotland from smacking their children have been opened up for public consultation. The move is ahead of a proposed member's bill in the Scottish Parliament which aims to give children equal protection from assault.

Many children’s lives are ruined by a distressing upbringing through ignorant abusive parents. Professions, which involve the responsibility of children, such as teachers or nursery workers, have been stripped of the right to smack children simply to try and stop bullying and increase civility.

Topic Sentence Number the evidence Technique and purpose Smacking is an effective form of discipline, and can lead to positive changes in behaviour. Appeal to leadership; appeal to responsibility. Smacking helps parents set boundaries. We will breed a generation of spoilt brats if children are not smacked. Appeal to moral values and lead-ership; shaming those who do not use effective.

Pros and Cons of Spanking Children. Spanking is one of the most controversial means of discipline. People are typically split into two distinct groups, people who support and people who are against. Some argue that it is a vital tool in teaching discipline and respect to young children. Others claim that it is violent and more harmful to the psyche of young kids. Is spanking really important.

Evidence shows children who are disciplined in a caring way are more socially responsible.” Labour MP Kevin Barron, who is behind the call to outlaw smacking, said: “We must act now to end the.